Over the last week I have been paying intense attention the issues surrounding the Obama / Republican middle and upper class tax deal. In the past I have generally supported President Obama in such things as his bail out of banks to save the economy and in his jettisoning of single payer health insurance because it simply was not doable. In this debate my positions is much closer to those of much of the political left. I think that there are several reasons for my change in attitude. First my knowledge of the economics of the earlier liquidity crisis was very weak. This fact when combined with my liking for Obama and my dislike of Left “purism” a real tendency in much of the left caused me to support Obama policies at that time. Since many economists still believe that Obama and his people saved the economy I do not renounce my position. The same tendencies also were major factors in my support of the Obama health care bill. I thought that it was simply perverse for many in the left to reject a very imperfect health care bill in the name of a non existing perfect one. Another factor in my support of Obama has been my general support of Barack Obama’s positions on foreign policy. I see nothing moral about throwing Afghanistan and Iraq to the friendly embrace of the Taliban and Al Qaeda theocracy and terrorism. I am very aware that the Karzai government is corrupt to its core but will a Taliban triumph in Afghanistan , the collapse of Iraq into anarchy, and using a domino theory analogy the triumph of Islamic theocracy over Pakistan and much of the Mid East be good for the peoples of those societies and America and humanity in general? I doubt it. However the resource drain is intense. Perhaps these wars are not winnable and it is time to cut and run. But if America does make a strategic retreat lets not make out that this will be the triumph of peace and love. It will be a triumph of evil and probably long term greater danger.
Obama's leadership in the Tax Debates?
Reply